JDRosenlaw
New: September 4, 2026 Case SummariesRead Summary →
JDRosenlaw — Legal Information Services for Colorado Criminal Defense Professionals

Supporting Colorado's criminal defense community with weekly summaries of Colorado Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Opinions and practical analysis to better serve your clients.

CCDB/ADC Road Show

Criminal Law Review with Jonathan Rosen

Join Jonathan Rosen for “Criminal Law Review,” his session at the 2026 CCDB/ADC Road Show — marking Jonathan's 10th anniversary presenting this program. This will be a fast-paced overview of the most important opinions issued between October 2025 and September 2026. Jonathan will break down what these decisions mean for your clients, offer practical guidance, and share his candid take on the state of our judiciary.

The Road Show hits Boulder, Fort Collins, Colorado Springs, Grand Junction, and Durango between August and September — find the date near you and register here.

Find Your Date & Register →
This Week's Featured Opinion
2026 COA 68 (September 3, 2026)Featured

People v. Page,

This is a really important opinion that you do not want to miss. Issue #1: The postconviction court erred by denying Page’s petition for postconviction DNA testing without a hearing because Page’s petition sufficiently alleged that there is “a reasonable probability that he would not have been convicted if favorable results had been obtained through DNA testing at the time of the original prosecution.” Issue #2: “Biological Evidence” for section 18-1-413(1)(b), is evidence that contains a testable quantity of DNA. Issue #3: The division refused the government’s invitation to apply “laches” as a means to avoid justice.

SponsoredAdvertise
Rector Stuzynski Law Firm
Recent Opinions
2026 COA 67 (September 3, 2026)

People v. Simpson,

A jury doesn’t need to see a video to determine that it is “obscene” material for purposes of a conviction for promotion of obscenity to a minor.

2026 COA 66 (September 3, 2026)

People v. Jargowsky,

Issue #1: The district court did not err when denying Jargowsky’s motions to suppress the records obtained through search warrants issued to business and financial institutions outside of El Paso County. Issue #2 Jargowsky argued that the trial court erred by admitting three categories of evidence. The division disagreed or found any purported error was harmless. Issue #3: Even if the district court erred by allowing two witnesses — a senior manager for Walmart and a retail crime investigator for Home Depot — to provide expert testimony about retail theft without being endorsed as experts, the error was harmless. Issue #4: There could be no confrontation clause violation for evidence offered to show the “effect on the listener” (state of mind), since it was not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Issue #5: The trial court did not err by rejecting Jargowsky’s proposed affirmative defense instructions on mistake of fact and mistake of law.

24CA0069 (September 3, 2026)

UNPUBLISHED People in Interest of S.H-S.,

In a sex assault on a child prosecution, the prosecution’s expert’s testimony that a child’s statements are more likely to be truthful if the child promises to be truthful before beginning the interview improperly bolstered the child-victim’s credibility.

23CA0762 (September 3, 2026)

UNPUBLISHED People v. Bonsell,

Accusations that Arapahoe County Judge Whitfield is a bench bully did not win the day for Bonsell, but could be a winning issue in the future if this is a pattern of behavior.

Full Access

Unlock the Complete Archive

Weekly case summaries, the full archive dating back to 2011, podcast episodes, CLE presentations, and Jonathan's blog commentary. Rates starting at $30/month.

View Plans & PricingDiscounted rates available